ACCEPTING THE ELECTION RESULTS


Since the restoration of free and fair elections in Guyana, the only election results that have been accepted were those of 1992, even though they, and most other elections since then, were accompanied by violence, particularly after the elections. The Opposition castigated the 2011 elections alleging ‘discrepancies,’ although admitting that the results would not have been affected. The PPP went further and alleged that the 2011 elections were rigged against it.

The consequences of the failure to accept election results have been devastating to Guyana. It results, after most elections, in serious post-election violence, which causes damage to property, injury and loss to innocent people and harm to Guyana. It further exacerbates ethnic tension, which the elections campaign would already have whipped up, drives fear in the population and generates a feeling of uncertainty in the minds of investors.

Continue reading “ACCEPTING THE ELECTION RESULTS”

THE PPP AND THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK


In the Gospel according to St. Mark, Psalm 10 Verse 25, Jesus is recorded as having said: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” In the 2000 plus years of the existence of Christianity, the view expressed by Jesus has lost much of its currency.

Because of the PPP’s philosophy and history, it was, until now, similarly impossible for the wealthy to enter into its leadership. While many of them came around to the PPP in 1992, by which time the PPP had moderated its policies towards private capital and to the West, none of the wealthy sought to be admitted to its leadership ranks. In a sense, therefore, the PPP’s leadership was as closed to the rich as the Kingdom of God was in the beginning era of Christianity. It did not take 2000 years but, as happened in Christianity, times are changing within the PPP.

Continue reading “THE PPP AND THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK”

JAGDEO AND THE PPP – LIFESTYLE AND POLITICS


In an article for my blog, www.conversationtree.gy, published in SN last Sunday, I took issue with a statement by former President Jagdeo that implied that Cheddi and Janet Jagan lived in luxury. His argument that the Jagans lived such a lifestyle, comparable to his own at the time his house was built, was an attempt to justify his own Cadillac lifestyle, which over the past few years has come under severe scrutiny and criticism.

There were outraged responses by many people to Jagdeo’s statement, including from Clem Seecharran and, more indirectly, Peter Fraser, two distinguished Guyanese historians living and working in the UK. But the most telling came from Nadira Jagan-Brancier, the Jagan daughter, Dr. Tulsie Dyal Singh and Sadie Amin. Dr. Singh, who conferred with Dr Jagan about his medical condition just before he died and visited his home, said that his own family home in Palmyra on the Corentyne when he was growing up in the 1950s was of similar size to the Jagan home. Sadie Amin gave a description of the modest lifestyle and home of the Jagans, including its leaking roof.

Continue reading “JAGDEO AND THE PPP – LIFESTYLE AND POLITICS”

LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF GUYANA TIMES


What follows below is a letter to the editor of Guyana Times, amended by additions, in response to two articles, which he has not published

I refer to two articles in your newspaper on March 18 and March 19 and now seek to respond to the false allegations therein about me.

Continue reading “LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF GUYANA TIMES”

DISCORDANT NOTES


As expected, the events at Babu John attracted wide attention and media coverage. A front page photograph in SN of President Ramotar belting out Bob Marley’s ‘Let’s Get Together’ was in striking contrast to the accusation by Dr. Bharat Jagdeo that during the 2011 elections, the Opposition APNU had sent drummers around calling on their supporters to ‘let’s get the coolies out,’ or words to that effect. Observers heard these two discordant notes, one a plea for unity in song, the other a divisive rant, and several others this past week.

The accusation against the PNCR created a storm and at press appearances, Dr. Jagdeo sought to defend his remarks. The PPP’s complaint is that it is treated unfairly. The media, it claims, focuses on the PPP and ignores the PNC’s historic appeal to racism. The fact is that when either political party appeals to its supporters to vote for its party, in whatever language, it is an appeal that is alleged to be directed to one ethnic group. In Guyana the appeal can easily appear to be overtly ethnic or be interpreted as such. It is the PPP that has borne the burden of these accusations. But if the PPP is guilty, so is APNU. Both parties have relied on, and sought to ensure at every elections, its solid bloc of ethnic support, while publicly encouraging cross over voting.

Continue reading “DISCORDANT NOTES”